PATCH for "Parenthesization bug"

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Hi,

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alexander Frink wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > Now, that we have an input parser, I fancy an idea: We can randomly create
> > all sorts of rational numbers with weird exponents, rational complex bases
> > etc. and build an ex from it.  This has then been run through the
> 
> If you replace "random" by "pseudo-random", i.e. deterministic,
> then this sounds like a good idea.

While nitpicking: if you give us some real random number source it
shouldn't make a difference.  :-)

> However I dislike a "make check" which passes with a probability
> of 95% and mysteriously fails in 5%.

Hmmmmm???  Why should it fail at all?  The whole point about the default
output and the input-parser (a.k.a. ginsh-input syntax) was to be mutually
compatible.

Saludos
     -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel at Uni-Mainz.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>