[GiNaC-list] amd64 - test failed

Peper peper at aster.pl
Sun Oct 22 16:54:23 CEST 2006


Hello,
test failed on amd64, any idea?

GiNaC will now take an exam with specific input (like a pupils' exam):
examining several historic failures just out of paranoia................ 
passed
examining consistency of numeric types.....Error: caught exception syntax 
error, unexpected ')', expecting ']' or ',' at )
examining power laws..... passed
examining consistency of symbolic functions.... passed
examining consistency of nestedsums 
functions..................................Error: caught exception syntax 
error, unexpected T_EOF, expecting ']' or ',' at
examining symbolic differentiationError: caught exception syntax error, 
unexpected T_EOF, expecting ']' or ',' at
examining polynomial GCD computation......... passed
examining rational function normalization..... passed
examining series expansion............ passed
examining symbolic matrix manipulations........ passed
examining linear solve...... passed
examining indexed objects........ passed
examining color objects... passed
examining clifford objects.......... passed
examining archiving system. passed
examining structure template.. passed
examining hash maps............ passed
examining miscellaneous other things........ passed
Error: something went wrong. (3 individual failures)
please check exams.out against exams.ref for more details.
happy debugging!
./exams.ref exams.out differ: byte 90, line 4
FAIL: run_exams
GiNaC will now run through some rather costly random consistency checks:
checking consistency of numeric types.. passed
checking consistency of symbolic functions.... passed
checking symbolic matrix manipulations..... passed
checking linear solve.......... passed
PASS: run_checks
GiNaC will now run through some basic timings:
timing commutative expansion and substitution.... passed
        size:   50      100     200     400
        time/s: 0.03    0.13    0.54    2.42
timing Laurent series expansion of Gamma function.... passed
        order:  10      15      20      25
        time/s: 0.05    0.09    0.38    1.47
timing determinant of univariate symbolic Vandermonde matrices.... passed
        dim:    6x6     8x8     10x10   12x12
        time/s: 0.006   0.05    0.5     4.61
timing determinant of polyvariate symbolic Toeplitz matricesError: caught 
exception syntax error, unexpected T_EOF, expecting ']' or ',' at
timing hash map operations.... passed
          size: 10000   50000   100000  500000
      insert/s: 0.02    0.09    0.19    0.86
        find/s: 0.01    0.05    0.1     0.5
       erase/s: 0.01    0.04    0.08    0.43
timing Lewis-Wester test A (divide factorials). passed 0.05s
timing Lewis-Wester test B (sum of rational numbers). passed 0.003s
timing Lewis-Wester test C (gcd of big integers). passed 0.024s
timing Lewis-Wester test D (normalized sum of rational fcns). passed 0.08s
timing Lewis-Wester test E (normalized sum of rational fcns). passed 0.04s
timing Lewis-Wester test F (gcd of 2-var polys). passed 0.012s
timing Lewis-Wester test G (gcd of 3-var polys). passed 0.38s
timing Lewis-Wester test H (det of 80x80 Hilbert). passed 1.24s
timing Lewis-Wester test I (invert rank 40 Hilbert). passed 0.37s
timing Lewis-Wester test J (check rank 40 Hilbert). passed 0.22s
timing Lewis-Wester test K (invert rank 70 Hilbert). passed 2.4s
timing Lewis-Wester test L (check rank 70 Hilbert). passed 1.28s
timing Lewis-Wester test M1 (26x26 sparse, det)Error: caught exception parser 
stack overflow at ^
timing Lewis-Wester test M2 (101x101 sparse, det) disabled
timing Lewis-Wester test N (poly at rational fcns) disabled
timing Lewis-Wester test O1 (three 15x15 dets)... passed 12.486s (average)
timing Lewis-Wester test O2 (Resultant) disabled
timing Lewis-Wester test P (det of sparse rank 101). passed 0.56s
timing Lewis-Wester test P' (det of less sparse rank 101). passed 0.84s
timing Lewis-Wester test Q (charpoly(P)). passed 19.01s
timing Lewis-Wester test Q' (charpoly(P')). passed 37.2s
timing computation of antipodes in Yukawa theory...... passed 21.85s (total)
timing Fateman's polynomial expand benchmark. passed 47.85s
Error: something went wrong. (2 individual failures)
please check times.out against times.ref for more details.
happy debugging!
./times.ref times.out differ: byte 261, line 8
FAIL: run_times
======================================
2 of 3 tests failed
Please report to <ginac-list at ginac.de>
======================================
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/ginac-1.3.4/work/ginac-1.3.4/check'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/ginac-1.3.4/work/ginac-1.3.4/check'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/ginac-1.3.4/work/ginac-1.3.4'
make: *** [check] Error 2


More information about the GiNaC-list mailing list